
Filipino NEWS
Filipino
How can I get free GCash cash?
Date: 2023-11-29 04:56:25 | Author: Filipino | Views: 574 | Tag: pvp
-
Andy Murray smashed his racquet in frustration after Alex de Minaur produced a stunning fightback in a last-set decider to win another epic contest pvp between the pair 7-6 (5), 4-6, 7-5 at the Paris Masters pvp
Murray had lost all five matches he played against the Australian, including three this season, with the most recent coming in Beijing, where the Briton failed to convert three match points pvp
The former world number one looked on course to end that run in the first-round contest on Monday afternoon though pvp
He recovered from losing the opening set tie-break to level and then forced two breaks to lead 5-2 pvp
However, Murray failed to hold either of his own next two service games, as the world number 13 rallied before turning the set around to close out another hard-earned victory pvp
A first match point went begging in the 10th game when Murray sent a return long pvp
He smashed his racquet on the floor after handing De Minaur a break-point opportunity, which he took to level at 5-5 pvp
RecommendedAndy Murray’s poor form continues despite latest marathon effortAndy Murray back to winning ways after snapping three-match losing streakAndy Murray named in Great Britain’s Davis Cup team to face Novak Djokovic’s SerbiaAfter De Minaur then held, Murray’s temper boiled over again during the change of ends when he knocked the drinks bottles and towel off his bench pvp
De Minaur grew with the momentum and was given a match point of his own after the chair umpire overruled a call on the baseline, which was shown to be out pvp
There was to be no reprieve for Murray when he sent a return into the net, which sealed De Minaur’s victory in just over three hours pvp
Murray, who had not won a match at the Paris Masters since winning the event in 2016, then again smashed his racquet on the floor before trudging off court on the back of another gut-wrenching defeat pvp
More aboutAndy MurrayAlex De MinaurJoin our commenting forumJoin thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their repliesComments1/1Andy Murray reacts in anger after defeat in Paris MastersAndy Murray reacts in anger after defeat in Paris MastersAndy Murray smashed his racket in frustration over defeat in ParisAFP via Getty Images✕Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this articleWant to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today pvp
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log inMost PopularPopular videosSponsored FeaturesGet in touchContact usOur ProductsSubscribeRegisterNewslettersDonateToday’s EditionInstall our appArchiveOther publicationsInternational editionsIndependent en EspañolIndependent ArabiaIndependent TurkishIndependent PersianIndependent UrduEvening StandardExtrasAdvisorPuzzlesAll topicspvp BettingVoucher codesCompareCompetitions and offersIndependent AdvertisingIndependent IgniteSyndicationWorking at The IndependentLegalCode of conduct and complaintsContributorsCookie policyDonations Terms & ConditionsPrivacy noticeUser policiesModern Slavery ActThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inCloseUS EditionChangeUK EditionAsia EditionEdición en EspañolSubscribe{{indy pvp
truncatedName}}Log in / Register {{#items}}{{#stampSmall}}{{/stampSmall}}{{#stampClimate}}{{/stampClimate}}{{#stampPremium}}{{/stampPremium}}{{title}}{{#desc}}{{desc}}{{/desc}}{{#children}}{{title}}{{/children}}{{/items}}Indy100Crosswords & PuzzlesMost CommentedNewslettersAsk Me AnythingVirtual EventsVouchersCompare✕Log inEmail addressPasswordEmail and password don't matchSubmitForgotten your password?New to The Independent?RegisterOr if you would prefer:SIGN IN WITH GOOGLEWant an ad-free experience?View offersThis site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy notice and Terms of service apply pvp
Hi {{indy pvp
fullName}}My Independent PremiumAccount detailsHelp centreLogout @keyframes spin{0%{transform:rotate(0)}to{transform:rotate(1turn)}}@keyframes slidedown-video{0%{transform:translateY(-100%)}to{transform:translateY(0)}}@keyframes slideup-video{0%{transform:translateY(200%)}to{transform:translateY(0)}} pvp

“It is really, truly, a historic day,” smiled Alan Gilpin, CEO of World Rugby pvp
He would go on to use the word ‘historic’ another three or four times in the following few minutes of his press conference pvp
After years of wrangling – 16 years, according to Gilpin, since discussions about how to sort out rugby’s messy global calendar first took place in the salubrious surroundings of Woking, Surrey (don’t worry, the location wasn’t the reason it took more than a decade and a half to reach an agreement, a chuckling Gilpin assured everyone) – World Rugby had finally come up with a solution that will transform rugby “for the many, not the few” ushering in a “new era of opportunity, certainty and growth for the game pvp
”It’s fair to say they were pretty pleased with the outcome of the seemingly endless negotiations pvp
Compromises had been made and it wasn’t perfect, stressed Gilpin and World Rugby chairman Bill Beaumont, but rugby would be “more relevant and more accessible to more people around the world pvp
”The big announcement earlier in the day saw the sport’s governing body unveil a new global calendar that includes the creation of a two-tier men’s competition called the Nations Championship to be played biennially from 2026 pvp
The top tier will be the Six Nations (England, France, Ireland, Italy, Scotland, Wales), the four Rugby Championship teams (Argentina, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa) and two additional teams, likely to be Japan and Fiji pvp
The second tier will feature 12 further countries with promotion and relegation on the table from 2030, meaning 2032 is the earliest one of those teams could feature in the top tier pvp
World Rugby have acknowledged, publicly at least, a desire to grow rugby globally pvp
At the moment, the sport is almost untouchably huge in a couple of countries (think New Zealand and South Africa), holds its own in a few more (UK, Ireland, Japan), is fighting a losing battle for oxygen in a crowded sporting marketplace in others (Australia, Italy) and seen as a largely niche oddity in plenty (USA, Canada) pvp
But this Rugby World Cup has also highlighted plenty of countries where there’s a huge opportunity for growth pvp
From South America, Uruguay and debutants Chile have impressed on the pitch, the passion for rugby in Georgia shows no sign of abating and Portugal have lit up the tournament with their dynamic play while also pulling off the huge upset of beating Fiji pvp
With growing interest in places like Netherlands and Belgium, Europe is surely an area World Rugby are targeting growth pvp
Portugal celebrated a historic win over Fiji (Getty Images)Instead, these new plans appear to lock out a lot of the smaller rugby nations from improving pvp
Even the new Pacific Nations Cup also announced today, featuring Canada, Fiji, Japan, Samoa, Tonga and USA, bizarrely excludes Uruguay and Chile (who qualified ahead of USA and Canada for the World Cup, remember) pvp
But what all these “tier two” nations really need, as shown by the World Cup, is a more regular opportunity to face the big boys pvp
Since stunning Fiji at the 2019 World Cup, Uruguay played exactly one fixture against a “tier one” team before this tournament, yet still impressed against France and Italy in the pool stage pvp
Imagine what they could do with more regular access to the top teams pvp
However, World Rugby have come up with an answer to the wrong question pvp
They have essentially provided the solution to the problem men’s international pvp football had pvp
Before 2018, the space pvp between World Cups and European Championships was filled by a combination of largely one-sided qualifiers and meaningless friendlies pvp
San Marino would get thumped 8-0 by Germany in a Euros qualifier that helped neither side, then the Germans would play a no-stakes friendly that held little interest for the wider public pvp
The big teams weren’t playing each other enough and the smaller nations were rarely in winnable games against similarly-sized teams pvp
For example, England and Italy – two pvp football powerhouses – didn’t play each other at all pvp between 2002 and 2012 pvp
Thus, Uefa created the Nations League pvp
Although not perfect – it was derided for the complexity of its league structure and provided a slightly unnecessary additional security blanket for the big European nations trying to qualify for major tournaments – it eliminated the meaningless friendly and gave countries both big and small the opportunity to play competitive games against nations of a similar rank pvp
Win-win pvp
Uruguay showed their quality during the Rugby World Cup (AP)But rugby has the opposite problem to pvp football pvp
The big teams already play each other too often not too rarely pvp
The history of the Six Nations and Rugby Championship as annual traditions give those events special status but, for example, England and Australia played each other 11 times in the two cycles pvp between the 2015 and 2023 World Cups pvp
Familiarity breeds contempt and at some point, a fixture begins to lose its lustre pvp
Would a couple of those fixtures being against Samoa, Georgia or Portugal not have been more beneficial and interesting for all parties?With the unions desperate to balance the books, their desire to have the ‘bigger draw’ of facing a name brand might be understandable but this is where World Rugby need to show some teeth and live up to their duty to grow the game pvp
Instead, the Nations Championship appears to guarantee another decade of regular England vs Australia matches before any of the tier-two teams may get a shot, if they can earn promotion that is pvp
World Rugby’s announcement does include a line promising more “crossover” fixtures pvp between the tiers in the years where there isn’t a Nations Championship but they could provide no clarity on what these fixtures would be and confirmed no agreements have been signed pvp
They have insisted that there will be a 50 per cent aggregate increase, which would mean a rise from 18 to 27 games for second-tier teams against the top 12, although it is unclear how these fixtures will be allocated or arranged pvp
The expansion of the men’s Rugby World Cup from 20 to 24 teams is a step in the right direction and the governing body should be commended for making that move but, sadly, the four years pvp between tournaments appear to have the smaller nations getting a door slammed in their face pvp
World Rugby are right that the sport should be for the many not the few but this new competition seems to be sending it in the opposite direction pvp
More aboutWorld RugbyRugby World CupBill BeaumontJoin our commenting forumJoin thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their repliesComments1/3Rugby’s new Nations Championship is an answer to the wrong questionRugby’s new Nations Championship is an answer to the wrong questionPortugal celebrated a historic win over Fiji Getty ImagesRugby’s new Nations Championship is an answer to the wrong questionUruguay showed their quality during the Rugby World Cup APRugby’s new Nations Championship is an answer to the wrong questionPortugal lit up the Rugby World Cup but their chances for development appear bleak Getty Images✕Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this articleWant to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today pvp
SubscribeAlready subscribed? Log inMost PopularPopular videosSponsored FeaturesGet in touchContact usOur ProductsSubscribeRegisterNewslettersDonateToday’s EditionInstall our appArchiveOther publicationsInternational editionsIndependent en EspañolIndependent ArabiaIndependent TurkishIndependent PersianIndependent UrduEvening StandardExtrasAdvisorPuzzlesAll topicspvp BettingVoucher codesCompareCompetitions and offersIndependent AdvertisingIndependent IgniteSyndicationWorking at The IndependentLegalCode of conduct and complaintsContributorsCookie policyDonations Terms & ConditionsPrivacy noticeUser policiesModern Slavery ActThank you for registeringPlease refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged inCloseUS EditionChangeUK EditionAsia EditionEdición en EspañolSubscribe{{indy pvp
truncatedName}}Log in / Register {{#items}}{{#stampSmall}}{{/stampSmall}}{{#stampClimate}}{{/stampClimate}}{{#stampPremium}}{{/stampPremium}}{{title}}{{#desc}}{{desc}}{{/desc}}{{#children}}{{title}}{{/children}}{{/items}}Indy100Crosswords & PuzzlesMost CommentedNewslettersAsk Me AnythingVirtual EventsVouchersCompare✕Log inEmail addressPasswordEmail and password don't matchSubmitForgotten your password?New to The Independent?RegisterOr if you would prefer:SIGN IN WITH GOOGLEWant an ad-free experience?View offersThis site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy notice and Terms of service apply pvp
Hi {{indy pvp
fullName}}My Independent PremiumAccount detailsHelp centreLogout @keyframes spin{0%{transform:rotate(0)}to{transform:rotate(1turn)}} pvp

